I'm revisiting the Fives and can feel the benefit of ending on a 'beingfull' session (as discussed in a video) and have changed my personal practice to finish that way. Am wondering if there is any particular reason for starting the Fives with shamatha rather than 'object no 1', which I have been doing as a way to come into my personal experience of here-&-now?
I'm guessing the answer would be that it doesn't matter too much, do what feels right for me and that just doing a practice is the thing - but I'm curious as to whether there is a rationale for starting with a shamata section.
Perhaps it's more interesting to observe how my thinking mind always likes to use my meditation time to analyse the practice and design new, better ones!!
Thanks X
Thanks for that @Harri Frost
I think the rationale with always beginning with shamata is that our minds tend to be very turbulent and it's hard to "see" what is going on with a mind that is all scatty and obscuring. So we begin most meditation with something to focus the energy of the mind into something more perspicacious.
The central Fives section is to train the mind to move from awareness of awareness (shamata) to awareness of phenomena (beingfulness) in a seamless and flexible way.
Then the closing section is a more outward orientated section of beingfulness.
Hope that makes sense.